Tag Archives: ku-jaku

Aikin Lambert Capitol Lady Dainty (1920s)

More eBay trawling resulted in this little dinky pen:

IMG_20170429_173059
Not an actual Conway Steward Dinkie.

This is the first Aikin Lambert I own, but not the first I’ve tried. About half a year ago, a family friend had heard I was “interested in pens” and so taken out something she had bought thirty years ago. It turned out to be an incredible overlay pen, slim, similar in size and length to my Mabie Todd Swan, and when I uncapped it, revealed a very slim nib. By then, I was experienced enough to know at sight that it was flexible. And I was allowed to dip and try it…

Having remembered the feel of that pen, I proceeded to add the maker’s name to my occasional eBay searches. Which is how I got this:

IMG_20170429_173137
Back of the nib, and the name wearing off the cap.

A Capitol Lady Dainty: similar in size to a Waterman 42 1/2 V (as in featured photo), it was far less troublesome as a lever filler and, while also far less flexible, was much eaiser to fiddle around with. The branding is also on the cap instead of the barrel.

IMG_20170429_173241
Flexible nib, latex sac and pen barrel.

The pen itself writes with a feed back unexpectedly similar to my Pilot, and though not as flexible as the one I first tried, definitely qualifies as a vintage semi-flex. It is also firm enough to use as a regular point nib, for which it writes a very pleasant Western fine. There is a toothy quality to it on Fabriano paper, which is slightly textured, but it glides across Tomoe River, the feed being juicy enough to keep the contact point well-lubricated. Using an excellent ink like an Iroshizuku helps greatly as well.

IMG_20170429_173108
A very expressive line and easy control make this pen awesome.

The nib has the capability of very expressive swells when called upon to function that way, though since this is one of my firmest vintage nibs, I often use this as a regular fine when I am rotating through my collection. Perhaps I should start looking again for one that is truly flexible…

Pilot Metropolitan Retro Pop (modified!)

This weekend we have another workhorse pen on my table! It will be a while before the next flex pen makes its way into a blogpost, so sit tight for a bit…

img_20161202_083535
The only colourful Pilot I have for now…

The Pilot Metropolitan, or MR, or Cocoon, or Knight (?!) is affectionately known as the Metro and needs no real introduction. Often mentioned in the same breath as the Lamy Safari/Al-Star when it comes to starter pens, my loyalties lie by far with the Pilot.

It is made of brass and consequently feels fairly hefty in a way that has often been described as “premium”. It weighs more than 1.5 times the Lamy Safari and sits at just over 1.3 times the Al-Star, yet with its well-built shape, lies perfectly in the hand.

The nib definitely outperforms every other pen in this price range I know of. Mine worked right out of the box after letting the cartridge flow a little, and wrote smoothly, with a real Japanese fine line. (In a nib size comparison, this pen comes in as finer than a Pelikan EF!) The same kind of line with would be expected with a fine uni-ball signo pen or the ubiquitous Pilot G2. And it is absolutely consistent: being a firm nib, it offers zero line variation.

img_20161202_083452
Doesn’t mess about at all.

The nib is easily swapped, as with Lamy’s offering, but it isn’t officially so, and is definitely not a feature. Pilot friction-fits its feeds and nibs, which means that with some well-applied force one could pull the nib out for a swap, at risk of loosening the fit in future. None of my Pilots have suffered from loosening yet, though. 

Pilot has designed an excellent feed: it wicks ink so well from the converter and works seamlessly with the nib such that the pen just keeps writing and writing until it stops. And with the included squeeze converter, which is opaque, this is a problem…

Yes, I could have bought a CON-50 or refilled an empty cartridge with a syringe, but why not give it a cosmetic upgrade instead? So I did some messing about on my own. The fact that Pilot makes a lot of pens with the same specification is good news for pen owners, who can swap nibs between Pilot’s Petit, Prera, Plumix, Pluminix, even the Kaküno — and, most importantly for the purposes of this write-up, the 78G.

Out of China comes the Wing Sung 659, a cheap clone of the Pilot 78G. It can be easily bought on eBay for less than £7 (US$10) and comes in a range of colours like the original as well as a demonstrator version, available in both gold and silver trim. And since it is a clone, its parts are interchangeable with the Pilot Metro!

img_20161202_083646
Around the pen: black section and grey feed from Pilot, and a Wing Sung 659 nib.

Best of all, it comes with its own converter, with a capacity slightly larger than that of Pilots own CON-50. With some jiggling of bits everything fits together nicely.

img_20161202_084756
That’s what’s hiding inside the body of my pen. Below: the provided squeeze converter.

But the real test of a pen is always how it writes. Since there is no line variation at all, this will be a short writing sample. As always, this is a Fabriano A5 dotpad:

img_20161202_084955
There is still enough juice to showcase shading and sheen.

Since the Iroshizuku Ku-jaku I happened to have the Metro inked with clashes with the pen body a little, I dug up an old Instagram photo of when I was comparing pink inks, during which I had a nice matching shade inside.